The first person to meet death is a soldier of low rank Ted Lavender who took to tranquilizers and marijuana to ward of war related anxiety. He is shot and his superior takes on the guilt because at that time he was thinking of an unrequited love; this guilty feeling haunted him even after 20 years following the war. There were other deaths in Alpha Company. Lemon was weak hearted and fainted during one routine checkup but to show he was tough he agreed to have a good tooth pulled out in The Dentist.
Truth and Fiction in Vietnam War Writing 2. Truth and Fiction in The things they carried 3. Introduction In the book The things they carried by Tim O'Brien, the narrator says that a good war story is never true.
He admits that nearly everything in the book is made up, after saying that it is true before. However, the reader learns that not until the 7th chapter, in which O'Brien, the narrator, tells the reader that everything up to now has been invented.
Similarly, he leaves open if some things are true or not. Even the narrator, who is named like the author himself, is made up and has no or little similarity to the author, e. Reading The things they carried, a question keeps coming up again and again: Why does he do that?
Why does Tim O'Brien, the narrator, constantly tell the reader that everything is made up? It does not make any sense. The reader just gets confused. In addition to this question, I found myself wondering if there was a clear difference between truth and fiction in the book, namely if you could say this is true and this is untrue and this is certain and this is uncertain.
And if yes, was it O'Brien's intention to draw this clear line, or did it just happen by accident? Of course, one cannot know everything for certain and no one can look into O'Brien's brain, but you can make assumptions based on the knowledge you have.
In my paper I will focus mainly on the aspect why the principle of truth and fiction is used in The things the carried and which effects come out of that.
I think this is very interesting, because, in my opinion, this is the main aspect of the whole book. Someone who reads it will not be able to stop themselves from asking questions in their head. The main process while reading is that you just keep asking yourself these questions again and again and you cannot find any answer to them.
My goal, however, is not to find any answers, but to try to explain this aspect truth and fiction as a whole and to examine what it might contribute to describe the Vietnam war.
At first, I will examine how this topic is treated in general Vietnam war writing, especially under the consideration of what truth actually is. Afterwards, I will compare these reasons with the general aspects of Vietnam war writing.
Furthermore, I will take a look at the effects that the use of fiction has and then, as a consequence, I will examine the topic trauma and its aftermaths. In the end, I will come to a conclusion.
To make it easier, I will use the male article for soldiers and war writers, because they they were all men. If something is true, you do not need to go further or explain anything else.
Documentaries, for example, are to be totally true. Fiction writers, in contrary, are completely free in their choice of truth. They can invent stories, characters, places etc. But what about war books? They are supposed to be documentaries, because war is an event that really happened.
So are all war writers forced to write the truth? What if they do not? Is untrue literature even good literature? Telling the truth is seen als some kind of catharsis among few Vietnam war writers.
Catharsis means that you feel excitement and passion during a difficult situation, e. For soldiers it means that they can process what happened in war. This says that you need to tell the truth to get your former life back, without a trace of trauma or similar illnesses.
Another source supports this view: Truth is compared to enlightenment.
The purpose of the writer is to enlight society and himself as well cf.Kiowa, a Native American Baptist, carries a pair of moccasins, a Bible and his grandfather’s feathered hatchet. His religion is an important part of his identity, and he is opposed to the platoon’s decision to stay in a semi-abandoned pagoda where two monks live, saying that all churches should be respected.
War Is S#*%We first learn about the sewage field in "Speaking of Courage," when Norman Bowker can't stop driving around a lake while he thinks about what happened to Kiowa.
The role of symbols in The Things They Carried Symbolism in O’Brien’s The Things They Carried runs rampant and plays a part in conveying the author's message O’Brien uses symbols to link ideas together.
The Things They Carried is told in a series of vignettes, or short stories, that provide a picture of a particular moment, story, emotion, or impression. Students will actually be quite familiar with vignettes if they . Metaphor Works Cited Pg. While being in a daze from Kiowa’s death, Lieutenant Jimmy Cross compares Kiowa to a lost gold ball and the platoon to the tired players: “A lost ball, he thought.
The role of symbols in The Things They Carried Symbolism in O’Brien’s The Things They Carried runs rampant and plays a part in conveying the author's message. O’Brien uses symbols to link ideas alphabetnyc.coms can be decrypted by the reader to unearth the true essence of the alphabetnyc.coms appear in all forms in the work, recurring as both tangible and intangible.